Legal Opinion

United States v. Chabot. United States v. Fliegel

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 19, 1951No. 22152-22153_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

Chabot and Fliegel were each indicted for wilfully possessing gold bullion without licenses in violation of Executive Order 6260, as amended, 12 U.S.C.A. § 95a note, and 12 U.S.C.A. § 95a. 1 Fliegel pleaded guilty, but Chabot stood trial. The government showed that customs agents had found 4300 ounces of gold bullion hidden in the body of Chabot’s car which he was attempting to ship abroad. Chabot rested after the government’s case, and the jury found him guilty.

1. Both appellants claim that Order 6260 and 12 U.S.C.A. § 95a, originating in 1933, were effectively repealed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CadyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1939
  2. Landau v. United States Attorney for Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Olson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  4. Farber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  5. Ruffino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul AjlounyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. Manfred SwarovskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Manuel Samora, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Sierra-GarciaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991
  5. United States v. MartiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API