Legal Opinion

United States v. Sierra-Garcia

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 18, 1991No. CR-90-0891PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GLASSER, District Judge:

The defendant Sierra-Garcia moves pursuant to Rule 12(b), Fed.R.Crim.P., and pursuant to the Due Process and Double Jeopardy clauses of the Fifth Amendment, for an order dismissing the indictment on the following grounds: (1) Counts 2-4 and 6-8 are multiplicitous; (2) Counts 5 and 9 are multiplicitous; (3) Counts 1-4 and 6-8 fail to state cognizable offenses, and (4) 18 U.S.C. § 1956 is unconstitutionally vague.

The essence of his claim that Counts 2-4 and 6-8 are multiplicitous can be clearly understood with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 in…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HydeArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. United States v. Harry C. KaufmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. CaroniaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
  4. United States v. SeljanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
  5. United States v. DeSalvoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API