Legal Opinion
Ruffino v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 11, 1940No. 9391PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
Appellant was indicted on three counts purporting to charge violations of the Trading With The Enemy Act, § 5(b), as amended March 9, 1933, 12 U.S.C.A. § 95a, and the Gold Reserve Act of 1934, § 3, 31 U.S.C.A. § 442. He entered a plea of guilty to the first count, the other two being dismissed.
The first count indicates parenthetically the two statutes by their code citations, and proceeds then to charge that appellant “on or about the fifth day of July, 1939, at Sutter Creek, in the County of Amador, within said division and district, said defendant then and there not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shelp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
- Farber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. ShibleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
- United States v. Chabot. United States v. FliegelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- United States v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Harold G. Bauer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Catamore Jewelry Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.