Legal Opinion

Kallen v. Pollock

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1963No. Appeal, 353PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

This is an appeal by Rhoda Pollock and her husband, Benjamin Pollock, from a final decree in equity based on a complaint filed by Roslyn Rallen. On August 31, 1955, Mrs. Rallen and Mrs. Pollock entered into a written partnership agreement to conduct a health salon. Disagreement soon arose between them and they began negotiations for a dissolution.

In her complaint, Mrs. Rallen alleges that on March 28, 1956, her attorney and Mrs. Pollock’s attorney orally agreed to a dissolution of the partnership, whereby Mrs. Rallen was to transfer her interest to Mrs. Pollock…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Payne v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Philadelphia v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Durso v. D'URSOSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of HoutsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  2. Farmers National Bank v. AlbertsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Miller v. MuellerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Rockey v. Big Spring School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Singer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API