Legal Opinion

Philadelphia v. Schofield

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1954No. Appeal, No. 216PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,

The procedure in this case, although adopted by the court below in a creditable attempt to effect a practical adjustment of the controversy, is open to objections which require that the record be remanded for final hearing.

In accordance with the Act of May 16, 1923, P. L. 207, a vacant piece of ground situate at the intersection of the northeast side of Manayunk Avenue and the northwest side of Hermit Street in the City of Philadelphia was sold at sheriffs sale for unpaid taxes due *556the city. The sale was held under that portion of section 31 of the Act…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Starling v. West Erie Avenue Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Grocery & Food Warehousemen Local Union No. 635 v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. John O. England, Trustee of the Estate of Irene Mansfeldt, Bankrupt v. Morgan J. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. Reed v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Kallen v. PollockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Singer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Lerner Master Fund, LLC v. Paige (In re Paige)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API