Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Turpen

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 23, 2007No. 57192-3-IPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — In April 2004, David and Carole Bauman filed a complaint against Ronald and Lauren Turpén to enforce a deed restriction that limited any home built on the Turpens’ property to “one story.” The Turpens began constructing their home after the lawsuit was filed. The trial court granted the Baumans’ motion for partial summary judgment, concluding that the 1949 covenant could not be interpreted by reference to the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC) or Seattle Building Code (SBC). After a three-day bench trial, the court found that the covenant was intended to preserve the views from neighboring…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. Chiwawa Communities Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. Ross v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Bauman v. TurpenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. In re the Estates of JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API