Legal Opinion

People v. Billingsley

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1943No. Crim. A. 1957PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwain, J.

On April 1, 1943, the defendant was convicted of violating section 41.05 of Ordinance 77000 of the city of Los Angeles (offering.) Her motion for a new trial was denied on April 5, 1943. On the same day the court on its own motion, and over the objection of the defendant, continued the cause to April 15 for hearing on probation and sentence, without a waiver by the defendant of time for sentence. The court thereupon referred the case to the Probation Department for investigation and report. On April 15 the court sentenced the defendant to 180 days in jail, suspended the execution of judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. People v. HainlineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. BlankenshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. In Re PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. People v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Brown v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API