Legal Opinion

Hoppe v. First National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1925No. 19535. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This 'is a case to be reviewed upon appeal on the pleadings, findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment. While appellant took exceptions to certain findings, he brought no statement of facts here, and is not in position to attack the findings.

A motion by respondent in the briefs to dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment because no statement of facts or bill- of exceptions is brought up, or, in the alternative, that appellant be required 'to bring up a statement of facts, is denied as not well taken. The only question before us is whether the findings of fact support the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Huron Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Casco National Bank of Portland v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Dunlap v. Seattle National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Terhune v. WeiseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. City of Seattle v. SmithersWashington Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Munson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Bank of California.v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Brinker v. Peoples Savings BankWashington Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API