United States v. Marquette Pierce
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted by the District Court, on stipulated facts and without a jury, of distributing, and of possessing with intent to distribute, heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). Prior to trial, the court denied a motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground of excessive delay, assertedly amounting to a denial of due process, in proceeding against appellant after the commission of the offense. See Ross v. United States, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 233, 349 F.2d 210 (1965). The court also announced that it would, as requested by the prosecution, dispense with the giving of the so-called…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Howard Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- United States v. John William WorkopichCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Joseph E. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Tony S. Hernandez, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Sergio T. RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Rickey Lee MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Paul C. Porter, United States v. Walter G. Baker, United States v. Frederick L. Hearn, United States v. Larry ReservitzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Jesse Collins, United States of America v. Leon HammondsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- State v. GordonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. HechtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. Joseph W. Bailey, United States of America v. David SloanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.