Legal Opinion
Alberto Q. Palor v. R. James Nicholson
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided June 29, 2007No. 04-0555PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*327MOORMAN, Judge:
The represented appellant, Alberto Q. Palor, appeals a November 24, 2003, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision that denied his claim for entitlement to basic eligibility for VA benefits. Record (R.) at 1-7. On May 10, 2007, the Court issued a decision affirming the Board’s decision. On May 16, 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) issued its decision in Sanders v. Nicholson, 487 F.3d 881, - (Fed.Cir.2007), addressing the application of the rule of prejudicial error in the context of allegations that VA failed to comply with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dingess - Hartman v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Larry A. Pelegrini v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2004
- Quartuccio v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
- Sanders v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Mayfield v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Capellan v. PeakeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Juliet T. Tagupa v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
- Johnnie R. Mangham v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
- 09-02 931Board of Veterans' Appeals · 2017
- 10-42 804Board of Veterans' Appeals · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.