Legal Opinion
Tompkins v. Sullivan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 8, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
This is a bill in equity in which the plaintiff alleges, in substance, that the defendants, some of whom are officers and members of a labor union and the others truck operators, conspired to interfere with his business and contractual relations with a company for which he and the other truck operators transported goods. The evidence is not reported and the trial judge made a report of material facts, evidently in accordance with G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 214, § 23. A decree dismissing the bill was entered, and, in the circumstances, must be affirmed if the conclusions of fact of the trial judge…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Beekman v. MarstersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Goldston v. RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Martell v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Comerford v. MeierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Buckley & Scott Utilities, Inc. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- North Station Wine Co. v. United Liquors, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Tompkins v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Keegan v. O'DonnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Price v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.