United States v. Julius C. Bomar
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-appellant Julius C. Bomar (Bo-mar) challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction for violation of a provision of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940 (the Act), 50 U.S.C.app. § 535(2), (3). Bomar was convicted of enforcing and attempting to enforce, without seeking court approval, a lien for storage of a 1985 Chevrolet Camaro owned by Gordon McNeely (McNeely), a corporal in the United States Army Reserve Unit who served on active duty in Saudi Arabia during Operation Desert Storm. He challenges the sufficiency of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Boone v. LightnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Harvey Thomas Smoot, Jr. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. Luz Estella Salazar, United States of America v. Jose Manuel RamosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Estate of LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Whigham v. CHASE AUTO FINANCE CORP.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Eaton v. AngeloneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Horn v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Martinez v. P.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
- United States v. B.C. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.