Legal Opinion

Hopkirk v. Bell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 28, 1807PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

8 U.S. 164

4 Cranch 164

2 L.Ed. 583

HOPKIRK

v.

BELL

February Term, 1807

1

THIS case was again certified from the circuit court for the district of Virginia.

2

It appeared upon the trial, in addition to the facts stated in the former report of the case,* that Andrew Johnston, one of the partners of the house, trading under the firm of Alexander Spiers, John Bowman and Company, of whom the plaintiff is the surviving partner, Came to this country after the treaty of peace in 1783, viz. in the spring of 1784, and died here in 1785, but that no other partner of the firm has been in this country, at any time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ware v. HyltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1796
  2. Hicks v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
  3. Hopkirk v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1807

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smedes v. President of Bank of UticaNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  2. United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1919
  3. Dunlop v. Alexander's AdministratorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1808

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API