Legal Opinion

Hilton v. Motor Vehicles Division

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1989No. TC 45182; CA A38100; SC S35799PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this driver’s license suspension proceeding, we allowed review to interpret the statutes governing the hearing process for suspending the driver’s license of a licensee who failed a sobriety test. The issue is whether the Motor Vehicles Division (MVD) must consider as an issue at that hearing the licensee’s claim that he was not driving at the time the police stopped his car and ordered him to submit to a breath test. We hold that the issue of whether an arrestee was driving is within the scope of the suspension hearing.

Police officers stopped a car occupied by Hilton and a companion.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. NewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Pooler v. Motor Vehicles DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. DeFazio v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Leabo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Comcast Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Javed v. Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. McIntyre v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Bish v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API