Legal Opinion
United States v. Darrick Morgan, AKA D. Morgan, United States of America v. Tyra Goodman, AKA Tyra Johnson, AKA T. Eileen Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 23, 2004No. 02-50603, 02-50617PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Tyra Goodman challenges her convictions for bank fraud and making false statements to a federally insured financial institution, stemming from the unauthorized acquisition and use of several business lines of credit. Goodman argues that the trial court erred in allowing the government to introduce a bankruptcy petition into evidence and in questioning her extensively from the bench. For the reasons stated below, we affirm Goodman’s convictions. Co-defendant Darrick Morgan does not challenge his convictions but challenges the sentence and restitution order,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Aleksandrs v. LaurinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Chris ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David BENSIMON, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Norberto Quintero-LeyvaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Van AlstyneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. AnkenyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. JerchowerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.