Legal Opinion

Matthews v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1991No. CR 90-211PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

On June 6, 1988, the appellant, Nathan Matthews, was charged in a felony information with rape. On April 21,1989, Matthews’ counsel at trial filed a joint motion to approve a stipulation; the stipulation was signed by the Prosecuting Attorney for the 20th Judicial District, Matthews, and Matthews’ counsel. It provided that the case would be tried to a jury solely on the issue of whether Matthews should be incarcerated or placed on supervised probation.

The trial court approved the stipulation on November 7, 1989, and Matthews subsequently entered a guilty plea.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Hamm v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. State v. ShermanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Gilbert v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Magar v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Pogue v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Wenzel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API