Legal Opinion

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Olympic Game Farm Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 8, 2022No. 3:18-cv-06025Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT SEATTLE 7 ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, Cause No. C18-6025RSL 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 10 OLYMPIC GAME FARM, INC., et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT 11 Defendants. 12 13 This matter comes before the Court on “Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.” 14 Dkt. # 126. Plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the owners and operators of an animal- 15 based attraction on the Olympic Peninsula have violated the federal Endangered Species Act 16 (“ESA”) by taking and possessing protected species…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API