Legal Opinion

People v. Berger

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 30, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Application by defendant-appellant for a writ of error coram nobis is denied.

There is no merit to defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on the appeal. Appellate counsel made a successful application in this court for leave to ¡proceed upon an abridged record “[flor good cause shown” (22 NYCRR 731.1 [b] [2]). Defendant’s present attorney contends that defendant’s appellate counsel did not read the trial transcript and, as a result of his failure to do so, he overlooked and failed to raise the argument that the lower court should have instructed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. StultzNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. HowzeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. People v. FloresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. People v. CopelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Carron (Cathy)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API