Legal Opinion

Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1933No. Appeal, 169PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Frazer,

The Cheltenham and Abington Sewerage Company has appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court affirming an order of the Public Service Commission sustaining complaints against the company’s tariff for sanitary sewerage service and storm water drainage service. By stipulation filed, the only matter presented for consideration by the Superior Court was the legality of the commission’s action, in so far as it undertook to find and determine that the storm water systems were not the property of the sewerage company and that rates and charges imposed by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weatherby v. MeiklejohnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Munn & Barton v. MayorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  3. Dwinel v. BarnardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1848
  4. Matlack v. CallahanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Versailles Township Authority v. McKeesportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Rodin v. State Ex Rel. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Galeb v. Cupertino Sanitary DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. In Re Borough of BellevueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API