Legal Opinion

Pittsburg Mortgage Inv. Co. v. Sneed

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 25, 1916No. 7545PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Texas County; W. O. Crow, Judge. Action by Edna B. Sneed against the Pitts-burg Mortgage Investment Company and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

Prior to May 16, 1906, Clay S. Mason made settlement as a homesteader on the land in controversy here, and continued to reside on said land from the time of his settlement until December 30,. 1913. A short time prior to March 30, 1909, • l he Pittsburg Mortgage Investment Company agreed to loan said Mason $500, of which sum enough should be paid to him at once to enable him to make commutation of his original settlement to a cash entry of the land settled upon and the balance of said amount was to be paid to him as soon as he had made his proof and received his receipt.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Fuller & Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  2. Orr v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Spiess v. NeubergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Weber v. LaidlerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Dickerson v. BridgesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burnett v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  2. First State Bank v. DurandMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Selway v. DautMontana Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API