Thomas L Pearson and the Pearson Family Members Foundation, The v. University of Chicago, The
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA THE THOMAS L. PEARSON AND THE PEARSON FAMILY MEMBERS FOUNDATION AND THOMAS L. PEARSON, INDIVIDUALLY, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, v. Case No. 18-CV-99-JWB THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant and Counterclaimant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the court on motions for partial summary judgment filed by both parties.1 (Docs. 187, 189.) The motions are fully briefed and ripe for decision. (Docs. 206, 207, 226, 229.) For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment is…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gorsuch, Ltd., B.C. v. Wells Fargo National Bank Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Rocanova v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.