Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Klauser v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

AppEae from the County Court of Shelby county; the Hon. J. K. P. Grider, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

' The board of supervisors of the county of Shelby, at the September session, 1912, levied a tax for county purposes, including the following items: “For mileage and per diem, $3000;” “for county farm, $3000;” “for judiciary, $5500.” To the application of the county collector for judgment for taxes the appellant objected to the extent of the proportion of the county tax extended against it by virtue of these three items, and from the adverse judgment of the county court it has appealed.

These items are insufficient to sustain the judgment, because they do not comply with the requirement of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. People ex rel. AxtellIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. People ex rel. McCordIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Olmsted v. Wabash Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. People ex rel. Novak v. SusmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API