Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Olmsted v. Wabash Railway Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1925No. 16570. Affirmed in part and reversed in partPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeYoung

To the; application of the county collector of :Vermilxon ■ cou'nty.i.px' judgment ■ and; .order of. sale for. delinquent ".taxes .the-;Wa„hash:'.B.ailway .-.Company filed, objections-to the town tax of the town of Danville and to the road and bridge taxes of the towns of Catlin and Newell. The objections were overruled by the county court and the railway company prosecutes this appeal.

The record of the annual town meeting of the town of Danville held on the first Tuesday of April, 1923, which was the third day of that month, shows that the electors present at that meeting directed that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Fredenberger v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People ex rel. Klauser v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. People ex rel. Nothern v. Wabash RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Wangelin v. City of St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. People Ex Rel. Wangelin v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Deyo v. Commissioner of HighwaysAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  4. Hudson v. WaltersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932
  5. People ex rel. Olmsted v. Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API