Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Oldham v. Dean

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1909No. 16,073PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Original application in the nature of quo warranto to determine the right of respondent to the office of judge of the supreme court.

1Opinion of the Court

Reese, O. J.

This is an action in the nature of a quo warranto, instituted by the relator, Willis D. Oldham, and against the respondent, James R. Dean, for the purpose of testing the right of said Dean to the office of judge of the supreme court. Sufficient facts are alleged in the information and answer to show the eligibility and competency on the part of both relator and respondent to hold said office if legally appointed thereto, and the only question is as to which of the parties received the legal appointment. So far as the facts involved in the case are concerned, there is practically…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. FrancisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Webster v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Ex parte Howard-Harrison Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. State ex rel. Casper v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. State ex rel. Douglas County v. FrankNebraska Supreme Court · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ellingham v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Swanson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Elmen v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State ex rel. Davis v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API