Legal Opinion

Andrew Greenberg, Inc. v. Sir-Tech Software, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 5, 2002PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Mercure, J.

Plaintiff, a New York corporation, created a computer game known as Wizardry. In 1981, plaintiff granted defendant Sir-Tech Software, Inc. (hereinafter Sir-Tech), another New York corporation, an exclusive license to market and manufacture Wizardry, related products and subsequent Wizardry games. The licensing agreement authorized Sir-Tech to conduct its manufacturing and marketing activities through a subsidiary or related business entities, but it was not permitted “to disclose any WIZARDRY game or WIZARDRY related product, information or source of materials to anyone, other…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mink v. AAAA Development LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Fantis Foods, Inc. v. Standard Importing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Peterson v. Spartan Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. LaMarca v. Pak-Mor Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Andrew Greenberg, Inc. v. Svane, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Andrew Greenberg, Inc. v. Sirtech Canada, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Nasso v. SeagalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  4. Andrew Greenberg, Inc. v. Sir-Tech Software, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Andrew Greenberg, Inc. v. Sir-Tech Software, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API