Legal Opinion

Barnum v. City of Tulsa

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 6, 2014No. 13-5096PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

JEROME A. HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

James Barnum and Tritanna Murphy (“Appellants”) appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their complaint without prejudice for failure to effectuate timely service on the defendants. Construing their pro se brief liberally, as we must, see Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S.Ct. 2197, 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007) (per curiam), we affirm the judgment of the district court.

I

On August 14, 2012, Appellants filed a civil-rights complaint in the Northern District of Oklahoma. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, they sued the City of Tulsa…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Meilleur v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  3. Olsen v. MapesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  4. Toby J. Espinoza v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Bolden v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Adebowale Ijiyode v. Oklahoma City Police Department, et al.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026
  2. Busby v. Communication Workers of America UnionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023
  3. Calhoun v. The Greens at Lake OverholserDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025
  4. Dorrell v. Comanche County Facilities AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025
  5. Drew v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2024

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API