Legal Opinion

In Re Harris

California Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1961No. Crim. 6962PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner’s salesman was arrested, without a warrant, for selling obscene books in violation of section 311, subdivision 3, of the Penal Code.

*880Incident to the arrest, virtually all the “books, magazines, writings, publications and papers” in petitioner’s bookstore were seized. Petitioner was thereafter charged in two counts with selling two specific books in violation of section 311, subdivision 3, of the Penal Code.

At his trial all the material which had been seized was introduced into evidence for the purpose of showing “intent or notice.”

Petitioner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Aday v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Grove Press, Inc. v. ChristenberryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. RollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. In Re LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API