Legal Opinion

Schaad v. Hotel Easton Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1952No. Appeal, 43PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

The question here presented is whether a dissenting owner of shares of preferred stock of a business corporation can be compelled, under a proposed scheme of recapitalization, to accept common stock in exchange for his holdings, with loss of his right to the then accrued, cumulative, undeclared and unpaid dividends.

Hotel Easton Company was incorporated in 1924 under, the General Corporation Act of April 29, 1874, P. L. 73. According to its articles of incorporation its capital structure consisted of 2500 shares of preferred stock of the par value of $100…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'n v. WinowichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Keller v. Wilson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1936
  4. Consolidated Film Industries, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
  5. Garey v. St. Joe Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pew TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. McCaffrey v. Pittsburgh Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Little Mountain Community Ass'n v. Southern Columbia Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Bove v. Community Hotel Corp. of Newport, RISupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  5. Moosic Lakes Club v. GorskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API