Garey v. St. Joe Mining Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; C. W. Morse, Judge. Action by Ellen Garey and others against the St. Joe Mining Company. From a judgment sustaining defendant’s demurrer, plaintiffs appeal. APPELLANT’S POINTS. . It is an elementary proposition that positive laws which subsist at the time and place of the malting of a contract, enter into and form a part of it as much as if they were expressly referred to>, or incorporated in its terms.
Read the full summary
Appeal from District Court, Third District; C. W. Morse, Judge. Action by Ellen Garey and others against the St. Joe Mining Company. From a judgment sustaining defendant’s demurrer, plaintiffs appeal. APPELLANT’S POINTS. . It is an elementary proposition that positive laws which subsist at the time and place of the malting of a contract, enter into and form a part of it as much as if they were expressly referred to>, or incorporated in its terms. (Bishop on Contracts, 567, et seq.; Von Hoffman v. Gity of Quincy, 4 Wall. 535; Green v. Biddle, 8 Wheat. 92; Bronson v. Kmzie, 1 How. 319; Ogden v.…
1Opinion of the CourtSteaup, J.
This action is brought by plaintiffs against the defendant, a mining corporation organized under the laws of the state of Utah, to restrain it from selling certain full-paid capital stock of the corporation owned by plaintiffs for tire nonpayment of an assessment levied against the stock by the board of directors-. It is alleged in the complaint, among other things, that the capital stock of the corporation is divided into one million shares, of the par value of $1 each, of which the plaintiffs are the owners of 149,881 shares; that all the outstanding capital stock is fully paid; that by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Looker v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Pronick v. Spirits Distributing Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899
- Snook v. Georgia Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Enterprise Ditch Co. v. MoffittNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by36 opinions
- Keller v. Wilson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1936
- Morris v. American Public Utilities CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Davis v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
- Davis v. Louisville Gas Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
- Kent Club v. TorontoUtah Supreme Court · 1957
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.