Legal Opinion

Eickhoff Corp. v. Warrior Met Coal, LLC

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 4, 2018No. 1161099Published

1Opinion of the Court

STUART, Chief Justice.

Warrior Met Coal, LLC ("Warrior Coal"), sued Eickhoff Corporation in the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court asserting that certain pieces of heavy mining equipment Eickhoff had manufactured and sold to Warrior Coal were defective. Eickhoff subsequently moved the trial court to compel Warrior Coal to arbitrate its claims pursuant to an arbitration provision in contracts executed after the sale of the equipment, not the original purchase-order contracts associated with the allegedly defective equipment. The trial court denied the motion to compel arbitration and Eickhoff appeals. We…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. CONTEC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. REMOTE SOLUTION CO., LTD., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API