Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2013No. 20120425-20120428PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Scott Wilson appeals a district court judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. Concluding the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous, we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Wilson was charged with four counts of issuing a check with insufficient funds or credit on July 27, 2010. Wilson requested court-appointed counsel, which the district court denied, finding he was not indigent. A trial was set for January 27, 2011, but Wilson later requested a change of plea, and the trial was rescheduled for February 15. The court instructed Wilson he could re-apply for…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Peguero v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Vincent Fischetti v. Philip Johnson Gerald J. Pappert.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. State v. MickoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State of West Virginia v. J.S.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. CollinsUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Kovalevich v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Chisholm v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Rencountre v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API