Legal Opinion

Crowell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1995PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

Joseph Crowell (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) decision denying Claimant’s petition to reinstate benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act.1

On March 17, 1992, Claimant sustained a work-related injury to his right foot when he was thrown from a hay wagon while working as a farm hand for Johnson Dairy Farm (Employer). A notice of compensation payable was filed on April 20, 1992, and Claimant commenced receiving benefits, from the date of his injury, in the amount of $227.50 per week…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. GribbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Farquhar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Harle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Busche v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McKay v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Vazquez v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Folk v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Presby Homes & Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Pan Building Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API