Legal Opinion
Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. State of Conn.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 15, 1990No. Civ. H-89-717 (PCD)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DORSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff sues under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”), 25 U.S.C. § 2701, et seq., 1 and now moves for summary judgment: (1) ordering the State, as required by IGRA, to negotiate with the Tribe concerning the terms of operation of games of chance, as defined by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-186a, et seq., on the Reservation, including any rules concerning prizes, wagers and frequency; (2) ordering the State and Tribe to conclude a Tribal-State corn- pact governing gaming activities on the Reservation within sixty days of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. State of Connecticut and William A. O'neill, Governor of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- The United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians v. The State of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Davis Moss, District Attorney of Tulsa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Flynt v. California Gambling Control CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Catskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Spokane Tribe of Indians v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.