Legal Opinion

Beach v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1983No. 82-1162PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal of his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, 1 appellant asserts as reversible error the trial court’s rejection of a proffered stipulation as to what constitutes a “usable amount” of heroin and its admission of expert testimony on that question. As we are unpersuaded by appellant’s contentions, we affirm his conviction.

The testimony at trial was that on October 31, 1981, two undercover policemen approached appellant in the 1900 block of 9th Street, Northwest, and gave him forty dollars in prerecorded bills in exchange for an envelope of heroin. Within minutes, a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Edelin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Darnell A. CatlettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Terrance Kevin Spriggs, A/K/A BobCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  3. Bell v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API