Legal Opinion

BROWN ET UX v. Eakins

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1960PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNCAN, J.,

(Pro Tempore)

In September, 1955, the parties made a contract whereby V. E. Eakins, doing business as Rose City Electric Co., defendant, undertook to install the electrical wiring in the house of plaintiffs, Clarence E. Brown and Mary Brown, husband and wife. Defendant performed the work in October, 1955. On November 7,1955, the house was damaged by fire. Thereafter plaintiffs filed a complaint against defendant for damage resulting from the fire, alleging that defendant breached the contract by failing to install the wiring in a workmanlike manner, which failure proximately caused…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newlee v. HeytingOregon Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Anchorage, Inc. v. Superior Burner Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1967
  3. American Petrofina Co. of Texas v. D & L Oil Supply, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Equitable Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Allied Steel Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  5. McGill Restoration v. Lion Place Condo. Assn.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API