Legal Opinion

Tanimura v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1952No. 13014_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

On February 28, 1950, the United States instituted suit against Tanimura, and two others against whom it was dismissed, charging them with violation of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amend-' ed, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., The Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1881 et seq., and the Rent Regulations under these Acts, 8 F.R. 7334; 12 F.R. 4302, by collecting rents in excess of the legally fixed maximum rates. It was asked through the complaint that an injunction be issued against further violations, that restitution of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Orenstein v. United States. United States v. OrensteinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  3. Thermo-Stitch, Inc. v. Chemi-Cord Processing Corp. And Standwear Pleating Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Martin v. Detroit Marine Terminals, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API