Legal Opinion

Riley v. Wieman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 1988PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kane, J. P.

This is an action for medical malpractice.

On June 15, 1981, Edna M. Riley was seen at the medical offices of Nichols, Cooke, Beach and Wieman in the Village of Owego, Tioga County, complaining of rectal bleeding. Defendant Dr. Philip A. Nichols examined Riley and asked her to return three days later to have two additional tests performed, a sigmoidoscopy and a barium enema. She returned on June 18, 1981 and was seen by defendant Dr. Henry M. Wieman, who, after preparation by his assistant, performed the sigmoidoscopy. This test requires the insertion of an *311instru…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. De Long v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Toth v. Community HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Schrempf v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Juiditta v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Payant v. ImoberstegAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Hoagland v. KampAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Mandel v. New York County Public AdministratorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Manuel Reis v. Volvo Cars of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Restrepo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API