Legal Opinion

Irrigation & Industrial Development Corp. v. Indag S. A.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1973PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArnold L. Fein, J.

In a prior action in this court commenced by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, pursuant to CPLE 3213, by the present defendant, Indag S. A. (Indag), as plaintiff, against the present plaintiff, Irrigation & Industrial Development Corporation (IIDC), as defendant, Indag’s motion was denied by order (Bloustein, J., August 17,1972), directing. Indag to serve a formal complaint within 30 days. Faced with litigating an ordinary action instead of obtaining an expeditious CPLR 3213 judgment, Indag did not serve a formal complaint. Instead, it served and filed a notice of voluntary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Getz v. Harry Silverstein, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1954
  2. Ardell Marine Corp. v. DuchinskyNew York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Battaglia v. BattagliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API