Legal Opinion

Williams v. Bresnahan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Russell, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

This is an action of replevin brought to recover possession of certa n saloon fixtures.

The plaintiff had a chattel mortgage on the property dated August 2, 1886, executed by one Marston, and filed on the same day.

John Fitzgerald held a mortgage on the same property, *635executed also by Marston on the first day of June, 1886, which was not filed until the fourth day of August following.

Each of these mortgages contained a provision that in case the mortgagor sold, assigned, or attempted to sell or assign, the mortgaged property, the mortgagee might take possesssion of the property, or any part…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Worthington v. HannaMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Kohl v. LynnMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J. L. Hudson Co. v. BarnettMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. O'Neill v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Nixon v. HoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API