Legal Opinion

Ware Supply Co. v. Sacramento Savings & Loan Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1966No. Civ. 23137PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.

In this action seeking recovery on a materialman’s bonded stop-notice claim made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1190.1; subdivision (h), defendant Sacramento Savings & Loan Association (Sacramento) appeals from a judgment entered in a non jury trial against said defendant and in favor of plaintiff Ware Supply Co. (Ware) in the sum of $7,362.42 together with interest from January 22, 1964 and costs. While defendant’s notice of appeal states that said defendant appeals from the whole of the judgment, it is evident from its statements before us that only $5,080 is actually at issue.

T…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Smith v. Anglo-California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. California Cigarette Concessions, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Cruise v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. R. D. Reeder Lathing Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Bentz Plumbing & Heating v. FavaloroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. E. D. McGillicuddy Construction Co. v. Knoll Recreation Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Burton v. SosinskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API