Legal Opinion

C.A.M. v. R.A.W.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 9, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

O’BRIEN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant. In her complaint, she asserted a variety of claims against defendant arising out of his false representation to her that he had had a vasectomy, on the basis of which she engaged in sexual intercourse with him resulting in the birth of a normal, healthy child. In granting summary judgment to defendant the trial judge ruled that, except for a paternity claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:17-38 et seq., and R. 5:14-1 et seq., plaintiff had no independent cause of action for damages…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sulcov v. 2100 Linwood Owners, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  2. Welzenbach v. PowersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. Martinez v. Republic of CubaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API