Legal Opinion

Fisser v. International Bank

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 22, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

Libelants, Carl and Martha Fisser, move pursuant to Rule 30(b), F.R.Civ.P. to vacate a notice of the taking of their testimony in New York or, in the alternative, that the deposition be taken at Hamburg, West Germany, and that respondent defray libelants’ counsel’s expense of attending there or, in the alternative, that the examinations be taken on written interrogatories.

Libelants, residents of Hamburg, West Germany, bring this action to compel arbitration to determine the damage sustained due to respondent’s alleged breach of an affreightment contract. Respondent has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hyam v. American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  2. Zweifler v. Sleco Laces, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  3. Montgomery v. SheldonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  4. Timblo v. Rhode Island InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Salitan v. CarrilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Colonial Capital Co. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
  3. Molinaro v. Lafayette Radio ElectronicsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Salitan v. CarrilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API