Montgomery v. Sheldon
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves (1) to vacate a notice for the taking of his testimony as premature and oppressive or, (2) in the alternative, that the notice be modified by direction of the court (a) adjourning the examination to afford plaintiff time to serve the summons on defendant Sheldon and (b) requiring examination upon written interrogatories at Tacoma, Washington.
The summons in this case has been served on all five defendants except defendant Sheldon, who is a resident of Connecticut. Plaintiff’s argument that the noticing of his examination is premature and oppressive is…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Salitan v. CarrilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Marlowe v. First State Bank of JacksboroCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
- Fisser v. International BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Bruce v. BruceSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1980
- Salitan v. CarrilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961