Legal Opinion

Decorative Imports v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 13, 1959No. C.D. 2099PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of these protests is described on the invoices as “Peel Beach Chair” or “Rattan Beach Chair.” It was assessed with duty at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 409 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for- — ■

* * * all articles not specially provided for, wholly or partly manufactured of rattan, bamboo, osier or willow.

Plaintiff contends that the articles are more specially provided for under the provision in paragraph 412 of the said act, as modified by the Presidential proclamation reported in T.D. 51802, for—

Furniture,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morimura Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Necchi Sewing Machine Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fabry Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Furniture Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Shelford, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Sprouse Reitz & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. Warren Atlantic, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API