Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United Fruit Co. v. Department of Labor & Industry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1942No. Appeal, 15PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

Section 305 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915, P. L. 736, as re-enacted and amended by the Act of June 21, 1939, P. L. 520, provides that an employer desiring to be exempt from insuring his liability for compensation shall make application to the Department of Labor and Industry, showing his financial ability to pay compensation, whereupon the Department, if satisfied of the applicant’s financial ability, shall issue a permit authorizing such exemption; from a refusal of the Department an appeal shall lie to the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. DiMassaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Andreas v. Imperial Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. Brown RubinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Lincoln Intermediate Unit No. 12 v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API