Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brown Rubin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1942No. Appeals, 289-292PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

The appellants, Brown and Rubin, were separately tried and found guilty on indictments charging each of them with wilful and corrupt perjury, in unlawfully, wilfully and corruptly making a false oath before an Alderman of the City of Reading to a nomination paper of the Communist Party.

Rubin was also tried, at the same time with his trial for perjury, and found guilty on an indictment (No. 204 December Sessions, 1940) charging that he had made a false statement in an affidavit required by the Election Code of June 3, 1937, P. L. 1333, which was appended to and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TrunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Commonwealth v. RagoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Commonwealth v. AnticoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Russo v. Ashe, WardenCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Watson v. WitkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. In re Incorporation of Borough of Valley-HiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. WaltersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API