Legal Opinion

Hirano v. Sand Island Treatment Center

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided January 25, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00473Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII DOUGLAS A. HIRANO, #87378-022, Civil. No. 20-00473 DKW-WRP Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH v. PARTIAL LEAVE TO AMEND SAND ISLAND TREATMENT CENTER, et al., Defendants. Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Douglas A. Hirano’s (“Hirano”) Verified Amended Complaint (First Amended Complaint or “FAC”) brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act,

28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671–2680. ECF No. 11. Hirano is currently…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API