Legal Opinion

Holler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 2014PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge P. KEVIN BROBSON.

Dane R. Holler (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), denying Claimant’s petition for benefits. Claimant sought benefits for injuries he sustained in an automobile accident that occurred while he was driving to Tri Wire Engineering Solution, Inc.’s (Employer) company facility. For the reasons discussed below, we now reverse the Board’s order and remand the matter for further proceedings.1

The facts of this case are not in dispute. Claimant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Wachs v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Southland Cable Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Roman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Beaver & Casey, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rana v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Kush v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Classic Landscaping, Inc. v. WCAB (Ramos)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. J. Bark v. Sooner Steel, LLC (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. J. Li v. WCAB (New Li Nail Spa, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API