Adams v. Patterson
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buknett
This is a proceeding to enforce payment of compensation under the'Workmen’s'Compensation Láw, Section 50-901 et seq., T.C.'A. The present action is based specifically on Section 50-1007, T.C.A. The trial judge allowed compensation but this was not satisfactory to the employee and he has appealed. '
The récord contains no''ñiótion for a new-trial. "There is no error in the technical "record. The employer moves to dismiss for this reason. In this state of the record, this Court is without jurisdiction to consider the propositions of fact here raised. Mullins v. Tennessee Stave & Lumber Co., 155…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Atlas Powder Company v. LeisterTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
- Mullins v. Tennessee Stave & Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Bailey v. American Glanzstoff Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by8 opinions
- McKenzie v. Campbell and Dann Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
- Hyter v. Wheland Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- Netherland v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- Green v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- Baine v. Queen Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.