Netherland v. Hunter
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · CainWilliam B. Cain, J.
in which WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., P.J., M.S., and PATRICIA J. COTTRELL, J., joined.
In this matter we are asked to determine which statute controls the issue of venue for a claim filed under the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, the venue provision of that act, Tennessee Code Annotated section 47-18-109, or Tennessee’s general venue provision, section 20-4-101 of the Code. The trial court determined that section 47-18-109 controls venue in this action and denied Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
It must be noted at the outset that…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Crane v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Woodroof v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. Safley, ChairmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Atlas Powder Company v. LeisterTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
- Strader v. United Family Life Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Gregory Fodness v. Newport and Cocke County Economic Development Commission, Inc. - DissentingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Roy Franks v. Tiffany SykesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
- Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company v. Virginia JonesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2026
- Thomas M. Gautreaux v. Internal Medicine Education - DissentingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009